[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220611082514.37112-3-dongli.zhang@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 01:25:12 -0700
From: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joe.jin@...cle.com,
hch@...radead.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
corbet@....net
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/4] swiotlb: remove useless return
Both swiotlb_init_remap() and swiotlb_init() have return type void.
Signed-off-by: Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index cb50f8d38360..fd21f4162f4b 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ void __init swiotlb_init_remap(bool addressing_limit, unsigned int flags,
void __init swiotlb_init(bool addressing_limit, unsigned int flags)
{
- return swiotlb_init_remap(addressing_limit, flags, NULL);
+ swiotlb_init_remap(addressing_limit, flags, NULL);
}
/*
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists