[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqSMmC/UuQpXdxtR@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 12:37:44 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Mike Marshall <hubcap@...ibond.com>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@...nel.org>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, devel@...ts.orangefs.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to 6c77676645ad ("iov_iter: Fix
iter_xarray_get_pages{,_alloc}()")
On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 12:12:47PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> At a guess, should be
> return min((size_t)nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
>
> in both places. I'm more than half-asleep right now; could you verify that it
> (as the last lines of both iter_xarray_get_pages() and iter_xarray_get_pages_alloc())
> builds correctly?
No, I'm misreading it - it's unsigned * unsigned long - unsigned vs. size_t.
On arm it ends up with unsigned long vs. unsigned int; functionally it *is*
OK (both have the same range there), but it triggers the tests. Try
return min_t(size_t, nr * PAGE_SIZE - offset, maxsize);
there (both places).
Al, going back to sleep - 4 hours is not enough...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists