[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220611133132.bqxlnqwp53qq6qor@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 15:31:32 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: Max Staudt <max@...as.org>
Cc: Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] can, tty: can327 CAN/ldisc driver for ELM327 based
OBD-II adapters
On 11.06.2022 15:16:49, Max Staudt wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 00:47:10 +0900
> Vincent Mailhol <vincent.mailhol@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > > > +#define ELM327_CAN_CONFIG_SEND_SFF 0x8000
> > > > +#define ELM327_CAN_CONFIG_VARIABLE_DLC 0x4000
> > > > +#define ELM327_CAN_CONFIG_RECV_BOTH_SFF_EFF 0x2000
> > > > +#define ELM327_CAN_CONFIG_BAUDRATE_MULT_8_7 0x1000
> >
> > This ELM327_CAN_CONFIG_BAUDRATE_MULT_8_7 macro is not used.
>
> True. It does document a flag in the ELM327 configuration registers
> though, and it was originally meant for adding 7/8 bitrates (e.g. 87500
> as a companion to 100000). I never got around to implementing those
> bitrates, though.
>
> I find opportunistic documentation helpful for future reference and
> to give casual readers hints - can I leave it in there anyway, or is it
> deemed an eyesore?
IMHO leave it in the driver.
regards,
Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists