lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220612211802.30a16623e8b0a55122b02386@kernel.org>
Date:   Sun, 12 Jun 2022 21:18:02 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...fian.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nathaniel McCallum <nathaniel@...fian.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Dan Li <ashimida@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
        "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Luis Machado <luis.machado@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Dave Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jordan Niethe <jniethe5@...il.com>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
        Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>,
        Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu>,
        Wu Caize <zepan@...eed.com>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tobias Huschle <huschle@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        André Almeida <andrealmeid@...lia.com>,
        Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
        Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Enable tracing for mololithic kernel images

On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 15:23:16 +0200
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 at 15:14, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:12:34AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:21 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Jarkko,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:25:38 +0300
> > > > Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:35:42AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > > > > .
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 8:02 AM Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...fian.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Tracing with kprobes while running a monolithic kernel is currently
> > > > > > > impossible because CONFIG_KPROBES is dependent of CONFIG_MODULES.  This
> > > > > > > dependency is a result of kprobes code using the module allocator for the
> > > > > > > trampoline code.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Detaching kprobes from modules helps to squeeze down the user space,
> > > > > > > e.g. when developing new core kernel features, while still having all
> > > > > > > the nice tracing capabilities.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > For kernel/ and arch/*, move module_alloc() and module_memfree() to
> > > > > > > module_alloc.c, and compile as part of vmlinux when either CONFIG_MODULES
> > > > > > > or CONFIG_KPROBES is enabled.  In addition, flag kernel module specific
> > > > > > > code with CONFIG_MODULES.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As the result, kprobes can be used with a monolithic kernel.
> > > > > > It's strange when MODULES is n, but vmlinux still obtains module_alloc.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe we need a kprobe_alloc, right?
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps not the best name but at least it documents the fact that
> > > > > they use the same allocator.
> > > > >
> > > > > Few years ago I carved up something "half-way there" for kprobes,
> > > > > and I used the name text_alloc() [*].
> > > > >
> > > > > [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200724050553.1724168-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com/
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I remember that. Thank you for updating your patch!
> > > > I think the idea (split module_alloc() from CONFIG_MODULE) is good to me.
> > > > If module support maintainers think this name is not good, you may be
> > > > able to rename it as text_alloc() and make the module_alloc() as a
> > > > wrapper of it.
> > >
> > > IIUC, most users of module_alloc() use it to allocate memory for text, except
> > > that module code uses it for both text and data. Therefore, I guess calling it
> > > text_alloc() is not 100% accurate until we change the module code (to use
> > > a different API to allocate memory for data).
> >
> > After reading the feedback, I'd stay on using module_alloc() because
> > it has arch-specific quirks baked in. Easier to deal with them in one
> > place.
> >
> 
> In that case, please ensure that you enable this only on architectures
> where it is needed. arm64 implements alloc_insn_page() without relying
> on module_alloc() so I would not expect to see any changes there.

Hmm, what about adding CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_ALLOC_INSN_PAGE and check it?
If it is defined, kprobes will not define the __weak function, but
if not, it will use module_alloc()?

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ