linux-kernel - [PATCH] refscale: Convert test_lock spinlock to raw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:02:25 +0800
From:   Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
To:     joel@...lfernandes.org, paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org
Cc:     rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] refscale: Convert test_lock spinlock to raw_spinlock

In PREEMPT_RT kernel, the spinlock are replaced by sleepable rt_mutex.
in a critical section where preemption is disabled this will trigger
calltrace like the following:

BUG: scheduling while atomic: ref_scale_reade/76/0x00000002
Preemption disabled at:
ref_lock_section+0x16/0x80
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x82
dump_stack+0x10/0x12
__schedule_bug.cold+0x9c/0xad
__schedule+0x839/0xc00
schedule_rtlock+0x22/0x40
rtlock_slowlock_locked+0x460/0x1350
rt_spin_lock+0x61/0xe0
ref_lock_section+0x29/0x80
rcu_scale_one_reader+0x52/0x60
ref_scale_reader+0x28d/0x490
kthread+0x128/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>

Convert spinlock to raw_spinlock to fix it.

Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/refscale.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
index 909644abee67..435c884c02b5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/refscale.c
@@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ static struct ref_scale_ops rwsem_ops = {
 };
 
 // Definitions for global spinlock
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(test_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(test_lock);
 
 static void ref_lock_section(const int nloops)
 {
@@ -393,8 +393,8 @@ static void ref_lock_section(const int nloops)
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	for (i = nloops; i >= 0; i--) {
-		spin_lock(&test_lock);
-		spin_unlock(&test_lock);
+		raw_spin_lock(&test_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&test_lock);
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 }
@@ -405,9 +405,9 @@ static void ref_lock_delay_section(const int nloops, const int udl, const int nd
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	for (i = nloops; i >= 0; i--) {
-		spin_lock(&test_lock);
+		raw_spin_lock(&test_lock);
 		un_delay(udl, ndl);
-		spin_unlock(&test_lock);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&test_lock);
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 }
@@ -427,8 +427,8 @@ static void ref_lock_irq_section(const int nloops)
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	for (i = nloops; i >= 0; i--) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&test_lock, flags);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&test_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test_lock, flags);
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 }
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@ static void ref_lock_irq_delay_section(const int nloops, const int udl, const in
 
 	preempt_disable();
 	for (i = nloops; i >= 0; i--) {
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&test_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&test_lock, flags);
 		un_delay(udl, ndl);
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test_lock, flags);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&test_lock, flags);
 	}
 	preempt_enable();
 }
-- 
2.25.1