[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220612100854.22e2c441@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:08:54 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Cixi Geng <gengcixi@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: adc: sc27xx_adc: Re-use generic struct
u32_fract
On Mon, 6 Jun 2022 11:12:15 +0800
Cixi Geng <gengcixi@...il.com> wrote:
> Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org> 于2022年6月4日周六 01:44写道:
> >
> > On Mon, 30 May 2022 21:09:10 +0300
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Instead of custom data type re-use generic struct u32_fract.
> >
> > There isn't a custom data type - I'll reword this whilst applying
> > if there is no reason for a v2.
> >
> > > No changes intended.
> >
> > functional changes
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > Given they have been active recently I'd ideally like Cixi Geng
> > to take a quick glance at this before I apply it.
> Acked-by: Cixi Geng <cixi.geng1@...soc.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and will be pushed out initially
as testing for 0-day to take a look.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c | 15 +++++++--------
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > > index e9ff2d6a8a57..f8421cbba8fa 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/sc27xx_adc.c
> > > @@ -579,15 +579,14 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_read(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel,
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -static void sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> > > - int channel, int scale,
> > > - u32 *div_numerator, u32 *div_denominator)
> > > +static void sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel, int scale,
> > > + struct u32_fract *fract)
> > > {
> > > u32 ratio;
> > >
> > > ratio = data->var_data->get_ratio(channel, scale);
> > > - *div_numerator = ratio >> SC27XX_RATIO_NUMERATOR_OFFSET;
> > > - *div_denominator = ratio & SC27XX_RATIO_DENOMINATOR_MASK;
> > > + fract->numerator = ratio >> SC27XX_RATIO_NUMERATOR_OFFSET;
> > > + fract->denominator = ratio & SC27XX_RATIO_DENOMINATOR_MASK;
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> > > @@ -615,7 +614,7 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_to_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_linear_graph *graph,
> > > static int sc27xx_adc_convert_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel,
> > > int scale, int raw_adc)
> > > {
> > > - u32 numerator, denominator;
> > > + struct u32_fract fract;
> > > u32 volt;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -637,9 +636,9 @@ static int sc27xx_adc_convert_volt(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data, int channel,
> > > break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(data, channel, scale, &numerator, &denominator);
> > > + sc27xx_adc_volt_ratio(data, channel, scale, &fract);
> > >
> > > - return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(volt * denominator, numerator);
> > > + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(volt * fract.denominator, fract.numerator);
> > > }
> > >
> > > static int sc27xx_adc_read_processed(struct sc27xx_adc_data *data,
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists