linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] proximity: vl53l0x: Handle the VDD regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 12 Jun 2022 11:28:22 +0200
From:   Luca Weiss <luca@...tu.xyz>
To:     Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@...rphone.com>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
        Song Qiang <songqiang1304521@...il.com>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] proximity: vl53l0x: Handle the VDD regulator

Hi Jonathan,

On Sonntag, 12. Juni 2022 10:53:33 CEST Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2022 12:18:52 +0200
> 
> "Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@...rphone.com> wrote:
> > Hi Markuss,
> > 
> > On Mon May 23, 2022 at 7:53 PM CEST, Markuss Broks wrote:
> > > Handle the regulator supplying the VDD pin of VL53L0X.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Markuss Broks <markuss.broks@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > >  drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c index 12a3e2eff464..8581a873919f
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/iio/proximity/vl53l0x-i2c.c
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> > > 
> > >  struct vl53l0x_data {
> > >  
> > >  	struct i2c_client *client;
> > >  	struct completion completion;
> > > 
> > > +	struct regulator *vdd_supply;
> > > 
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static irqreturn_t vl53l0x_handle_irq(int irq, void *priv)
> > > 
> > > @@ -192,10 +193,31 @@ static const struct iio_info vl53l0x_info = {
> > > 
> > >  	.read_raw = vl53l0x_read_raw,
> > >  
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > +static void vl53l0x_power_off(void *_data)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vl53l0x_data *data = _data;
> > > +
> > > +	regulator_disable(data->vdd_supply);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int vl53l0x_power_on(struct vl53l0x_data *data)
> > > +{
> > > +	int ret;
> > > +
> > > +	ret = regulator_enable(data->vdd_supply);
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > > +	usleep_range(3200, 5000);
> > > +
> > > +	return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > 
> > >  static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > >  {
> > >  
> > >  	struct vl53l0x_data *data;
> > >  	struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> > > 
> > > +	int error;
> > > 
> > >  	indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
> > >  	if (!indio_dev)
> > > 
> > > @@ -210,6 +232,21 @@ static int vl53l0x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> > > 
> > >  				     I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
> > >  		
> > >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > 
> > > +	data->vdd_supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(&client->dev, 
"vdd");
> > > +	if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_supply))
> > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, PTR_ERR(data-
>vdd_supply),
> > > +				     "Unable to get VDD 
regulator\n");
> > 
> > It looks like this optional regulator is not actually optional.
> > 
> > [    1.919995] vl53l0x-i2c 1-0029: error -ENODEV: Unable to get VDD
> > regulator
> > 
> > When using devm_regulator_get instead, a dummy regulator gets returned
> > which I think is what we want here:
> > 
> > [    1.905518] vl53l0x-i2c 1-0029: supply vdd not found, using dummy
> > regulator
> > 
> > Can you fix this up or should I send a patch?
> 
> Hi Luca,
> 
> Please send a patch.

Which commit sha can I use for Fixes: here?
Based your togreg[0] branch currently shows "Age: 20 hours" I guess it was 
rebased recently?

Regards
Luca

[0]https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=togreg

> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > Regards
> > Luca
> > 
> > > +
> > > +	error = vl53l0x_power_on(data);
> > > +	if (error)
> > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, error,
> > > +				     "Failed to power on the 
chip\n");
> > > +
> > > +	error = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, vl53l0x_power_off,
> > > data);
> > > +	if (error)
> > > +		return dev_err_probe(&client->dev, error,
> > > +				     "Failed to install poweroff 
action\n");
> > > +
> > > 
> > >  	indio_dev->name = "vl53l0x";
> > >  	indio_dev->info = &vl53l0x_info;
> > >  	indio_dev->channels = vl53l0x_channels;