[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mteg3flp.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 14:36:18 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vschneid@...hat.com,
kernel-team@...roid.com, Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@...gle.com>,
Derek Dolney <z23@...teo.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu/hotplug: Do not bail-out in DYING/STARTING sections
Vincent,
On Mon, May 23 2022 at 17:05, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> +static int _cpuhp_invoke_callback_range(bool bringup,
> + unsigned int cpu,
> + struct cpuhp_cpu_state *st,
> + enum cpuhp_state target,
> + bool nofail)
> {
> enum cpuhp_state state;
> - int err = 0;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> while (cpuhp_next_state(bringup, &state, st, target)) {
> + int err;
> +
> err = cpuhp_invoke_callback(cpu, state, bringup, NULL, NULL);
> - if (err)
> + if (!err)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (nofail) {
> + pr_warn("CPU %u %s state %s (%d) failed (%d)\n",
> + cpu, bringup ? "UP" : "DOWN",
> + cpuhp_get_step(st->state)->name,
> + st->state, err);
> + ret = -1;
I have a hard time to map this to the changelog:
> those sections. In that case, there's nothing the hotplug machinery can do,
> so let's just proceed and log the failures.
That's still returning an error code at the end. Confused.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists