lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:09:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Haisu Wang <haisuwang@...cent.com>,
        samuelliao <samuelliao@...cent.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 118/339] blk-mq: do not update io_ticks with passthrough requests

From: Haisu Wang <haisuwang@...cent.com>

[ Upstream commit b81c14ca14b631aa1abae32fb5ae75b5e9251012 ]

Flush or passthrough requests are not accounted as normal IO in completion.
To reflect iostat for slow IO, io_ticks is updated when stat show called
based on inflight numbers.
It may cause inconsistent io_ticks calculation result.

So do not account non-passthrough request when check inflight.

Fixes: 86d7331299fd ("block: update io_ticks when io hang")
Signed-off-by: Haisu Wang <haisuwang@...cent.com>
Reviewed-by: samuelliao <samuelliao@...cent.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220530064059.1120058-1-haisuwang@tencent.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 block/blk-mq.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 9d33e0032fee..de7fc6957271 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ static bool blk_mq_check_inflight(struct request *rq, void *priv,
 {
 	struct mq_inflight *mi = priv;
 
-	if ((!mi->part->bd_partno || rq->part == mi->part) &&
+	if (rq->part && blk_do_io_stat(rq) &&
+	    (!mi->part->bd_partno || rq->part == mi->part) &&
 	    blk_mq_rq_state(rq) == MQ_RQ_IN_FLIGHT)
 		mi->inflight[rq_data_dir(rq)]++;
 
-- 
2.35.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ