[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220613094926.421188355@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:10:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jun Miao <jun.miao@...el.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (Google)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 114/247] tracing: Fix sleeping function called from invalid context on RT kernel
From: Jun Miao <jun.miao@...el.com>
[ Upstream commit 12025abdc8539ed9d5014e2d647a3fd1bd3de5cd ]
When setting bootparams="trace_event=initcall:initcall_start tp_printk=1" in the
cmdline, the output_printk() was called, and the spin_lock_irqsave() was called in the
atomic and irq disable interrupt context suitation. On the PREEMPT_RT kernel,
these locks are replaced with sleepable rt-spinlock, so the stack calltrace will
be triggered.
Fix it by raw_spin_lock_irqsave when PREEMPT_RT and "trace_event=initcall:initcall_start
tp_printk=1" enabled.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 1, name: swapper/0
preempt_count: 2, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffffff8992303e>] try_to_wake_up+0x7e/0xba0
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.17.1-rt17+ #19 34c5812404187a875f32bee7977f7367f9679ea7
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.14.0-2 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0x8c
dump_stack+0x10/0x12
__might_resched.cold+0x11d/0x155
rt_spin_lock+0x40/0x70
trace_event_buffer_commit+0x2fa/0x4c0
? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
trace_event_raw_event_initcall_start+0xbe/0x110
? perf_trace_initcall_finish+0x210/0x210
? probe_sched_wakeup+0x34/0x40
? ttwu_do_wakeup+0xda/0x310
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x35/0x170
? map_vsyscall+0x93/0x93
do_one_initcall+0x217/0x3c0
? trace_event_raw_event_initcall_level+0x170/0x170
? push_cpu_stop+0x400/0x400
? cblist_init_generic+0x241/0x290
kernel_init_freeable+0x1ac/0x347
? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x65/0x80
? rest_init+0xf0/0xf0
kernel_init+0x1e/0x150
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
</TASK>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220419013910.894370-1-jun.miao@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jun Miao <jun.miao@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index b49756608f83..98b06d3ce164 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2840,7 +2840,7 @@ trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve(struct trace_buffer **current_rb,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_event_buffer_lock_reserve);
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(tracepoint_iter_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(tracepoint_iter_lock);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(tracepoint_printk_mutex);
static void output_printk(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
@@ -2868,14 +2868,14 @@ static void output_printk(struct trace_event_buffer *fbuffer)
event = &fbuffer->trace_file->event_call->event;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
trace_seq_init(&iter->seq);
iter->ent = fbuffer->entry;
event_call->event.funcs->trace(iter, 0, event);
trace_seq_putc(&iter->seq, 0);
printk("%s", iter->seq.buffer);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tracepoint_iter_lock, flags);
}
int tracepoint_printk_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists