[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220613094911.313838683@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:10:47 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 087/172] NFSv4: Dont hold the layoutget locks across multiple RPC calls
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
[ Upstream commit 6949493884fe88500de4af182588e071cf1544ee ]
When doing layoutget as part of the open() compound, we have to be
careful to release the layout locks before we can call any further RPC
calls, such as setattr(). The reason is that those calls could trigger
a recall, which could deadlock.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index b6d60e69043a..b22da4e3165b 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -3086,6 +3086,10 @@ static int _nfs4_open_and_get_state(struct nfs4_opendata *opendata,
}
out:
+ if (opendata->lgp) {
+ nfs4_lgopen_release(opendata->lgp);
+ opendata->lgp = NULL;
+ }
if (!opendata->cancelled)
nfs4_sequence_free_slot(&opendata->o_res.seq_res);
return ret;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists