linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 146/172] s390/gmap: voluntarily schedule during key setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220613094922.433992166@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:11:46 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 146/172] s390/gmap: voluntarily schedule during key setting

From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 6d5946274df1fff539a7eece458a43be733d1db8 ]

With large and many guest with storage keys it is possible to create
large latencies or stalls during initial key setting:

rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
rcu:   18-....: (2099 ticks this GP) idle=54e/1/0x4000000000000002 softirq=35598716/35598716 fqs=998
       (t=2100 jiffies g=155867385 q=20879)
Task dump for CPU 18:
CPU 1/KVM       R  running task        0 1030947 256019 0x06000004
Call Trace:
sched_show_task
rcu_dump_cpu_stacks
rcu_sched_clock_irq
update_process_times
tick_sched_handle
tick_sched_timer
__hrtimer_run_queues
hrtimer_interrupt
do_IRQ
ext_int_handler
ptep_zap_key

The mmap lock is held during the page walking but since this is a
semaphore scheduling is still possible. Same for the kvm srcu.
To minimize overhead do this on every segment table entry or large page.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220530092706.11637-2-borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/mm/gmap.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
index f2d19d40272c..2db097c14cec 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
@@ -2596,6 +2596,18 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_pte(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Give a chance to schedule after setting a key to 256 pages.
+ * We only hold the mm lock, which is a rwsem and the kvm srcu.
+ * Both can sleep.
+ */
+static int __s390_enable_skey_pmd(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
+				  unsigned long next, struct mm_walk *walk)
+{
+	cond_resched();
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
 				      unsigned long hmask, unsigned long next,
 				      struct mm_walk *walk)
@@ -2618,12 +2630,14 @@ static int __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb(pte_t *pte, unsigned long addr,
 	end = start + HPAGE_SIZE - 1;
 	__storage_key_init_range(start, end);
 	set_bit(PG_arch_1, &page->flags);
+	cond_resched();
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static const struct mm_walk_ops enable_skey_walk_ops = {
 	.hugetlb_entry		= __s390_enable_skey_hugetlb,
 	.pte_entry		= __s390_enable_skey_pte,
+	.pmd_entry		= __s390_enable_skey_pmd,
 };
 
 int s390_enable_skey(void)
-- 
2.35.1