| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9017824.rMLUfLXkoz@kreacher>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 20:35:26 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 14/16] soundwire: Use acpi_dev_for_each_child()
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Instead of walking the list of children of an ACPI device directly,
use acpi_dev_for_each_child() to carry out an action for all of
the given ACPI device's children.
This will help to eliminate the children list head from struct
acpi_device as it is redundant and it is used in questionable ways
in some places (in particular, locking is needed for walking the
list pointed to it safely, but it is often missing).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
---
v1 -> v2:
* Make sure errors are not lost (Pierre-Louis).
* Add R-by and T-by from Pierre-Louis.
---
drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
@@ -127,6 +127,71 @@ static bool find_slave(struct sdw_bus *b
return true;
}
+struct sdw_acpi_child_walk_data {
+ struct sdw_bus *bus;
+ struct acpi_device *adev;
+ struct sdw_slave_id id;
+ bool ignore_unique_id;
+};
+
+static int sdw_acpi_check_duplicate(struct acpi_device *adev, void *data)
+{
+ struct sdw_acpi_child_walk_data *cwd = data;
+ struct sdw_bus *bus = cwd->bus;
+ struct sdw_slave_id id;
+
+ if (adev == cwd->adev)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &id))
+ return 0;
+
+ if (cwd->id.sdw_version != id.sdw_version || cwd->id.mfg_id != id.mfg_id ||
+ cwd->id.part_id != id.part_id || cwd->id.class_id != id.class_id)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (cwd->id.unique_id != id.unique_id) {
+ dev_dbg(bus->dev,
+ "Valid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
+ cwd->id.unique_id, id.unique_id, cwd->id.mfg_id,
+ cwd->id.part_id);
+ cwd->ignore_unique_id = false;
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ dev_err(bus->dev,
+ "Invalid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
+ cwd->id.unique_id, id.unique_id, cwd->id.mfg_id, cwd->id.part_id);
+ return -ENODEV;
+}
+
+static int sdw_acpi_find_one(struct acpi_device *adev, void *data)
+{
+ struct sdw_bus *bus = data;
+ struct sdw_acpi_child_walk_data cwd = {
+ .bus = bus,
+ .adev = adev,
+ .ignore_unique_id = true,
+ };
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &cwd.id))
+ return 0;
+
+ /* Brute-force O(N^2) search for duplicates. */
+ ret = acpi_dev_for_each_child(ACPI_COMPANION(bus->dev),
+ sdw_acpi_check_duplicate, &cwd);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (cwd.ignore_unique_id)
+ cwd.id.unique_id = SDW_IGNORED_UNIQUE_ID;
+
+ /* Ignore errors and continue. */
+ sdw_slave_add(bus, &cwd.id, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev));
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* sdw_acpi_find_slaves() - Find Slave devices in Master ACPI node
* @bus: SDW bus instance
@@ -135,8 +200,7 @@ static bool find_slave(struct sdw_bus *b
*/
int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus *bus)
{
- struct acpi_device *adev, *parent;
- struct acpi_device *adev2, *parent2;
+ struct acpi_device *parent;
parent = ACPI_COMPANION(bus->dev);
if (!parent) {
@@ -144,54 +208,7 @@ int sdw_acpi_find_slaves(struct sdw_bus
return -ENODEV;
}
- list_for_each_entry(adev, &parent->children, node) {
- struct sdw_slave_id id;
- struct sdw_slave_id id2;
- bool ignore_unique_id = true;
-
- if (!find_slave(bus, adev, &id))
- continue;
-
- /* brute-force O(N^2) search for duplicates */
- parent2 = parent;
- list_for_each_entry(adev2, &parent2->children, node) {
-
- if (adev == adev2)
- continue;
-
- if (!find_slave(bus, adev2, &id2))
- continue;
-
- if (id.sdw_version != id2.sdw_version ||
- id.mfg_id != id2.mfg_id ||
- id.part_id != id2.part_id ||
- id.class_id != id2.class_id)
- continue;
-
- if (id.unique_id != id2.unique_id) {
- dev_dbg(bus->dev,
- "Valid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
- id.unique_id, id2.unique_id, id.mfg_id, id.part_id);
- ignore_unique_id = false;
- } else {
- dev_err(bus->dev,
- "Invalid unique IDs 0x%x 0x%x for Slave mfg_id 0x%04x, part_id 0x%04x\n",
- id.unique_id, id2.unique_id, id.mfg_id, id.part_id);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
- }
-
- if (ignore_unique_id)
- id.unique_id = SDW_IGNORED_UNIQUE_ID;
-
- /*
- * don't error check for sdw_slave_add as we want to continue
- * adding Slaves
- */
- sdw_slave_add(bus, &id, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev));
- }
-
- return 0;
+ return acpi_dev_for_each_child(parent, sdw_acpi_find_one, bus);
}
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists