[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <951dc92e-b4fe-71fb-4601-d9df1319a9ca@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:31:02 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: <ira.weiny@...el.com>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] testing/pkeys: Add command line options
On 6/10/2022 4:35 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> Add command line options for debug level and number of iterations.
>
> $ ./protection_keys_64 -h
> Usage: ./protection_keys_64 [-h,-d,-i <iter>]
> --help,-h This help
> --debug,-d Increase debug level for each -d
Is this mechanism (of counting d's) commonplace in other selftests as
well? Looking at the test code for pkeys the debug levels run from 1-5.
That feels like quite a few d's to input :)
Would it be easier to input the number in the command line directly?
Either way it would be useful to know the debug range in the help.
Maybe something like:
--debug,-d Increase debug level for each -d (1-5)
The patch seems fine to me otherwise.
> --iterations,-i <iter> repeate test <iter> times
> default: 22
>
Thanks,
Sohil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists