lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 13 Jun 2022 15:31:02 -0700
From:   Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To:     <ira.weiny@...el.com>, <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] testing/pkeys: Add command line options

On 6/10/2022 4:35 PM, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:

> Add command line options for debug level and number of iterations.
> 
> $ ./protection_keys_64 -h
> Usage: ./protection_keys_64 [-h,-d,-i <iter>]
>          --help,-h   This help
> 	--debug,-d  Increase debug level for each -d

Is this mechanism (of counting d's) commonplace in other selftests as 
well? Looking at the test code for pkeys the debug levels run from 1-5. 
That feels like quite a few d's to input :)

Would it be easier to input the number in the command line directly?

Either way it would be useful to know the debug range in the help.
Maybe something like:
	--debug,-d  Increase debug level for each -d (1-5)

The patch seems fine to me otherwise.

> 	--iterations,-i <iter>  repeate test <iter> times
> 		default: 22
> 

Thanks,
Sohil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ