[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202206131643.4FB2340C43@keescook>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:46:29 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
serge@...lyn.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] LSM: SafeSetID: Add setgroups() security policy
handling
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 02:00:03PM -0700, Micah Morton wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 1:28 PM Micah Morton <mortonm@...omium.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > +static int safesetid_task_fix_setgroups(struct cred *new, const struct cred *old)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + /* Do nothing if there are no setgid restrictions for our old RGID. */
> > + if (setid_policy_lookup((kid_t){.gid = old->gid}, INVALID_ID, GID) == SIDPOL_DEFAULT)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + get_group_info(new->group_info);
> > + for (i = 0; i < new->group_info->ngroups; i++) {
> > + if (!id_permitted_for_cred(old, (kid_t){.gid = group_info->gid[i]}, GID)) {
>
> Oops, should be:
>
> !id_permitted_for_cred(old, (kid_t){.gid = new->group_info->gid[i]}, GID)
>
> Guess I won't send a whole new patch just for that one line
This begs the question: are there self-tests for this LSM somewhere?
It'd be really nice to add them to tool/testing/selftests ...
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists