[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220613085437.GC3195@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 09:54:37 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@...wei.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
yangyicong@...ilicon.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>,
Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@...edance.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched/fair: Introduce SIS_UTIL to search idle CPU
based on sum of util_avg
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 04:06:36PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:40:52PM +0800, Yicong Yang wrote:
> > On 2022/6/13 0:34, Chen Yu wrote:
> > >
> [cut...]
> > > #define NUMA_IMBALANCE_MIN 2
> > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/features.h b/kernel/sched/features.h
> > > index 1cf435bbcd9c..3334a1b93fc6 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/sched/features.h
> > > +++ b/kernel/sched/features.h
> > > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ SCHED_FEAT(TTWU_QUEUE, true)
> > > * When doing wakeups, attempt to limit superfluous scans of the LLC domain.
> > > */
> > > SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, true)
> > > +SCHED_FEAT(SIS_UTIL, true)
> > >
> >
> > confused here that shouldn't we have SCHED_FEAT(SIS_PROP, false)? With SIS_UTIL enabled, SIS_PROP will have no
> > effect since nr is overridden by SIS_UTIL.
> Yes, no matter what SIS_PROP is set, the result of SIS_UTIL would be used to decide
> the scan depth. We don't change the default value of SIS_PROP here, as this patch
> tends to only touch one feature at one time. And the options could be tuned by user via
> sysfs manually. Besides, the target is to replace SIS_PROP with another search policy,
> Peter mentioned that "And ideally we're remove SIS_PROP after a few releases if this
> works out", so I assume that changing the default value of SIS_PROP does not matter
> in current patch.
>
I had expected it to be disabled given that SIS_PROP does work to
calculcate nr, then discards it, and uses SIS_UTIL. If SIS_UTIL shows a
regression and reports a bug, the first step would be to disable
SIS_UTIL and enable SIS_PROP via sched_feat.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists