[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <23002f21-9dfb-31b4-c6c7-86f4e292dfea@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 22:50:05 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/8] cgroup/cpuset: Allow no-task partition to have
empty cpuset.cpus.effective
On 6/12/22 13:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry about the long delay.
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:34:08AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> Once a partition with empty "cpuset.cpus.effective" is formed, no
>> new task can be moved into it until "cpuset.cpus.effective" becomes
>> non-empty.
> This is always true due to no-tasks-in-intermediate-cgroups requirement,
> right?
I seems to remember there are corner cases where a task can be moved to
an intermediate cgroup under circumstances. I need to dig further to
find out what it is.
Cheers,
Longman
Powered by blists - more mailing lists