[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220613094841.753640147@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:07:58 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 004/167] btrfs: add "0x" prefix for unsupported optional features
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
commit d5321a0fa8bc49f11bea0b470800962c17d92d8f upstream.
The following error message lack the "0x" obviously:
cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (4000)
Add the prefix to make it less confusing. This can happen on older
kernels that try to mount a filesystem with newer features so it makes
sense to backport to older trees.
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2716,7 +2716,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
~BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP;
if (features) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
- "cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (%llx)",
+ "cannot mount because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
features);
err = -EINVAL;
goto fail_alloc;
@@ -2769,7 +2769,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
~BTRFS_FEATURE_COMPAT_RO_SUPP;
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY) && features) {
btrfs_err(fs_info,
- "cannot mount read-write because of unsupported optional features (%llx)",
+ "cannot mount read-write because of unsupported optional features (0x%llx)",
features);
err = -EINVAL;
goto fail_alloc;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists