linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 182/218] lkdtm/usercopy: Expand size of "out of frame" object

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220613094926.130121619@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jun 2022 12:10:40 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 182/218] lkdtm/usercopy: Expand size of "out of frame" object

From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

[ Upstream commit f387e86d3a74407bdd9c5815820ac9d060962840 ]

To be sufficiently out of range for the usercopy test to see the lifetime
mismatch, expand the size of the "bad" buffer, which will let it be
beyond current_stack_pointer regardless of stack growth direction.
Paired with the recent addition of stack depth checking under
CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY=y, this will correctly start tripping again.

Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/762faf1b-0443-5ddf-4430-44a20cf2ec4d@collabora.com/
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
index a64372cc148d..178b55141772 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_usercopy.c
@@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ static const unsigned char test_text[] = "This is a test.\n";
  */
 static noinline unsigned char *trick_compiler(unsigned char *stack)
 {
-	return stack + 0;
+	return stack + unconst;
 }
 
 static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
 {
-	unsigned char buf[32];
+	unsigned char buf[128];
 	int i;
 
 	/* Exercise stack to avoid everything living in registers. */
@@ -43,7 +43,12 @@ static noinline unsigned char *do_usercopy_stack_callee(int value)
 		buf[i] = value & 0xff;
 	}
 
-	return trick_compiler(buf);
+	/*
+	 * Put the target buffer in the middle of stack allocation
+	 * so that we don't step on future stack users regardless
+	 * of stack growth direction.
+	 */
+	return trick_compiler(&buf[(128/2)-32]);
 }
 
 static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
@@ -66,6 +71,12 @@ static noinline void do_usercopy_stack(bool to_user, bool bad_frame)
 		bad_stack -= sizeof(unsigned long);
 	}
 
+#ifdef ARCH_HAS_CURRENT_STACK_POINTER
+	pr_info("stack     : %px\n", (void *)current_stack_pointer);
+#endif
+	pr_info("good_stack: %px-%px\n", good_stack, good_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+	pr_info("bad_stack : %px-%px\n", bad_stack, bad_stack + sizeof(good_stack));
+
 	user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
 			    PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
 			    MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE, 0);
-- 
2.35.1