linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KUnit tests for drm_format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:03:42 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     José Expósito <jose.exposito89@...il.com>
Cc:     davidgow@...gle.com, dlatypov@...gle.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
        maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
        airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] KUnit tests for drm_format_helper

On 6/13/22 19:17, José Expósito wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Here is the v3 of the series, including the documentation, previously
> sent as a standalone patch [1], and changes suggested during review.
> 
> Thanks a lot,
> José Expósito
> 

Before merging this, could you please reach the folks working on [0] ?

I think that would be good to have some consistency with regard to KUnit
tests from the start to avoid future refactorings. For instance, you are
adding the tests under a `kunit` sub-directory while they are doing it
in a `tests` sub-dir.

Also there may be other things that could be made more consistent, like
the naming conventions for the tests, suites, etc.

[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220608010709.272962-4-maira.canal@usp.br/T/

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat