[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220614132333.143042-1-xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 21:23:33 +0800
From: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
To: <paul@...l-moore.com>, <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
<eparis@...isplace.org>, <cgzones@...glemail.com>,
<austin.kim@....com>, <omosnace@...hat.com>,
<michalorzel.eng@...il.com>
CC: <selinux@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH -next] selinux: Fix memleak in security_read_policy
In this function, it directly returns the result of __security_read_policy
without freeing the allocated memory in *data, cause memory leak issue,
so free the memory if __security_read_policy failed.
Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@...wei.com>
---
security/selinux/ss/services.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
index 69b2734311a6..78afda6a36b8 100644
--- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
+++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
@@ -4018,6 +4018,7 @@ static int __security_read_policy(struct selinux_policy *policy,
int security_read_policy(struct selinux_state *state,
void **data, size_t *len)
{
+ int err;
struct selinux_policy *policy;
policy = rcu_dereference_protected(
@@ -4030,7 +4031,13 @@ int security_read_policy(struct selinux_state *state,
if (!*data)
return -ENOMEM;
- return __security_read_policy(policy, *data, len);
+ err = __security_read_policy(policy, *data, len);
+ if (err) {
+ vfree(*data);
+ *data = NULL;
+ *len = 0;
+ }
+ return err;
}
/**
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists