linux-kernel - Re: Commit 282d8998e997 (srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers from consuming CPU) cause qemu boot slow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <88780123-32a3-ab34-cd3d-01e4a3421f03@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 19:44:27 +0530
From:   Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
To:     "zhangfei.gao@...mail.com" <zhangfei.gao@...mail.com>,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>
CC:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "rcu@...r.kernel.org" <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "mtosatti@...hat.com" <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
        Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        "chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: Commit 282d8998e997 (srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking
 readers from consuming CPU) cause qemu boot slow



On 6/14/2022 7:33 PM, zhangfei.gao@...mail.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2022/6/14 下午8:19, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> 5.18-rc4 based               ~8sec
>>>
>>> 5.19-rc1                     ~2m43sec
>>>
>>> 5.19-rc1+fix1                 ~19sec
>>>
>>> 5.19-rc1-fix2                 ~19sec
>>>
>>
>> If you try below diff on top of either 5.19-rc1+fix1 or 5.19-rc1-fix2 
>> ; does it show any difference in boot time?
>>
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
>> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static void srcu_schedule_cbs_snp(struct 
>> srcu_struct *ssp, struct srcu_node *snp
>>   */
>>  static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>>  {
>> -       unsigned long cbdelay;
>> +       unsigned long cbdelay = 1;
>>         bool cbs;
>>         bool last_lvl;
>>         int cpu;
>> @@ -726,7 +726,9 @@ static void srcu_gp_end(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>>         spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(ssp);
>>         idx = rcu_seq_state(ssp->srcu_gp_seq);
>>         WARN_ON_ONCE(idx != SRCU_STATE_SCAN2);
>> -       cbdelay = !!srcu_get_delay(ssp);
>> +       if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq), 
>> READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp)))
>> +               cbdelay = 0;
>> +
>>         WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_last_gp_end, ktime_get_mono_fast_ns());
>>
> Test here:
> qemu: https://github.com/qemu/qemu/tree/stable-6.1
> kernel: 
> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk/tree/uacce-devel-5.19-srcu-test
> (in case test patch not clear, push in git tree)
> 
> Hardware: aarch64
> 
> 1. 5.18-rc6
> real    0m8.402s
> user    0m3.015s
> sys     0m1.102s
> 
> 2. 5.19-rc1
> real    2m41.433s
> user    0m3.097s
> sys     0m1.177s
> 
> 3. 5.19-rc1 + fix1 from Paul
> real    2m43.404s
> user    0m2.880s
> sys     0m1.214s
> 
> 4. 5.19-rc1 + fix2: fix1 + Remove "if (!jbase)" block
> real    0m15.262s
> user    0m3.003s
> sys     0m1.033s
> 
> When build kernel in the meantime, load time become longer.
> 
> 5. 5.19-rc1 + fix3: fix1 + SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE 1000000
> real    0m15.215s
> user    0m2.942s
> sys    0m1.172s
> 
> 6. 5.19-rc1 + fix4: fix1 + Neeraj's change of srcu_gp_end　
> real    1m23.936s
> user    0m2.969s
> sys    0m1.181s
> 

Thanks for this data. Can you please share below test combo also?

7. 5.19-rc1 + fix5: fix2 + Neeraj's change of srcu_gp_end


8. 5.19-rc1 + fix6: fix3 + Neeraj's change of srcu_gp_end


Thanks
Neeraj

> More test details: https://docs.qq.com/doc/DRXdKalFPTVlUbFN5
> 
> Thanks
>