[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220614162635.3445019-1-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 18:26:35 +0200
From: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To: thuth@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com, pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc: david@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, scgl@...ux.ibm.com, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: selftests: Fix memop extension capability check
Fix the inverted logic of the memop extension capability check.
Fixes: 97da92c0ff92 ("KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the memop test")
Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
---
Here you go.
Hope it doesn't get lost as a reply, but I can always resend
and it's not super critical after all.
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
index e704c6fa5758..e1056f20dfa1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390x/memop.c
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
ksft_set_plan(ARRAY_SIZE(testlist));
for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(testlist); idx++) {
- if (testlist[idx].extension >= extension_cap) {
+ if (extension_cap >= testlist[idx].extension) {
testlist[idx].test();
ksft_test_result_pass("%s\n", testlist[idx].name);
} else {
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists