[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yqi6Fd38ZCsDUnQG@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 18:40:53 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: rth@...ddle.net, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@...il.com,
vgupta@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
ulli.kroll@...glemail.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
shawnguo@...nel.org, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com, linux-imx@....com,
tony@...mide.com, khilman@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org, guoren@...nel.org, bcain@...cinc.com,
chenhuacai@...nel.org, kernel@...0n.name, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
sammy@...my.net, monstr@...str.eu, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de,
dinguyen@...nel.org, jonas@...thpole.se,
stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, shorne@...il.com,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, deller@....de,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp, dalias@...c.org,
davem@...emloft.net, richard@....at,
anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
srivatsa@...il.mit.edu, amakhalov@...are.com,
pv-drivers@...are.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
chris@...kel.net, jcmvbkbc@...il.com, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, pavel@....cz, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
sudeep.holla@....com, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, anup@...infault.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
yury.norov@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
linux@...musvillemoes.dk, rostedt@...dmis.org, pmladek@...e.com,
senozhatsky@...omium.org, john.ogness@...utronix.de,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, openrisc@...ts.librecores.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/36] cpuidle: Fix rcu_idle_*() usage
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 04:27:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> > @@ -622,9 +622,13 @@ struct cpumask *tick_get_broadcast_onesh
> > * to avoid a deep idle transition as we are about to get the
> > * broadcast IPI right away.
> > */
> > -int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
> > +noinstr int tick_check_broadcast_expired(void)
> > {
> > +#ifdef _ASM_GENERIC_BITOPS_INSTRUMENTED_NON_ATOMIC_H
> > + return arch_test_bit(smp_processor_id(), cpumask_bits(tick_broadcast_force_mask));
> > +#else
> > return cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), tick_broadcast_force_mask);
> > +#endif
> > }
>
> This is somewhat not-ideal. :/
I'll say.
> Could we unconditionally do the arch_test_bit() variant, with a comment, or
> does that not exist in some cases?
Loads of build errors ensued, which is how I ended up with this mess ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists