linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement stack trace reliability checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YqjKBF1dNKbTZrpY@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 18:48:52 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, ardb@...nel.org,
        nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com, sjitindarsingh@...il.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/7] arm64: Reorganize the unwinder and implement
 stack trace reliability checks

On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 09:05:21AM -0500, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com wrote:
> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
> 
> I have rebased this patch series on top of this branch:
> 
> 	arm64/stacktrace/cleanups
> 
> in Mark Rutland's fork of Linux. The branch contains a set of patches
> from Mark and me for reliable stack trace.

Do you have any plans to resend this based on v5.19-rcN?  I know you
were waiting for some more review feedback but everyone's review queues
will most likely have been flushed with the new release so it'll need a
resend.  I was half thinking about some related stuff so I went to apply
these but saw there's some small conflicts.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)