linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: remove redundant re-assignments to pointer array

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <606859dd0edcc2330fc353b0cb15395ed883b5bc.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 11:48:10 -0700
From:   Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: remove redundant re-assignments
 to pointer array

On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 19:38 +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> There are two occurrences where the pointer array is being assigned a
> value
> that is never read, the pointer gets updated in the next iteration of
> a
> loop. These assignments are redundant and can be removed.
> 
> Cleans up clang scan-build warnings:
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c:2953:3: warning: Value stored
> to
> 'array' is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
> sound/soc/intel/skylake/skl-topology.c:3602:3: warning: Value stored
> to
> 'array' is never read [deadcode.DeadStores]
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>

LGTM, thanks!

Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>