lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 15:44:31 -0700
From:   Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:     Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
        German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...el.com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
        Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@...com>,
        Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] perf cpumap: Fix alignment for masks in event encoding

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:34 AM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> A mask encoding of a cpu map is laid out as:
>   u16 nr
>   u16 long_size
>   unsigned long mask[];
> However, the mask may be 8-byte aligned meaning there is a 4-byte pad
> after long_size. This means 32-bit and 64-bit builds see the mask as
> being at different offsets. On top of this the structure is in the byte
> data[] encoded as:
>   u16 type
>   char data[]
> This means the mask's struct isn't the required 4 or 8 byte aligned, but
> is offset by 2. Consequently the long reads and writes are causing
> undefined behavior as the alignment is broken.
>
> Fix the mask struct by creating explicit 32 and 64-bit variants, use a
> union to avoid data[] and casts; the struct must be packed so the
> layout matches the existing perf.data layout. Taking an address of a
> member of a packed struct breaks alignment so pass the packed
> perf_record_cpu_map_data to functions, so they can access variables with
> the right alignment.
>
> As the 64-bit version has 4 bytes of padding, optimizing writing to only
> write the 32-bit version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h | 36 +++++++++++--
>  tools/perf/tests/cpumap.c           | 19 ++++---
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.c            | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.h            |  4 +-
>  tools/perf/util/session.c           | 30 +++++------
>  tools/perf/util/synthetic-events.c  | 34 +++++++-----
>  6 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
> index e7758707cadd..d2d32589758a 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/event.h
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/limits.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>  #include <sys/types.h> /* pid_t */
>
>  #define event_contains(obj, mem) ((obj).header.size > offsetof(typeof(obj), mem))
> @@ -153,20 +154,47 @@ enum {
>         PERF_CPU_MAP__MASK = 1,
>  };
>
> +/*
> + * Array encoding of a perf_cpu_map where nr is the number of entries in cpu[]
> + * and each entry is a value for a CPU in the map.
> + */
>  struct cpu_map_entries {
>         __u16                    nr;
>         __u16                    cpu[];
>  };
>
> -struct perf_record_record_cpu_map {
> +/* Bitmap encoding of a perf_cpu_map where bitmap entries are 32-bit. */
> +struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map32 {
> +       /* Number of mask values. */
>         __u16                    nr;
> +       /* Constant 4. */
>         __u16                    long_size;
> -       unsigned long            mask[];
> +       /* Bitmap data. */
> +       __u32                    mask[];
>  };
>
> -struct perf_record_cpu_map_data {
> +/* Bitmap encoding of a perf_cpu_map where bitmap entries are 64-bit. */
> +struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map64 {
> +       /* Number of mask values. */
> +       __u16                    nr;
> +       /* Constant 8. */
> +       __u16                    long_size;
> +       /* Legacy padding. */
> +       char                     __pad[4];
> +       /* Bitmap data. */
> +       __u64                    mask[];
> +};
> +
> +struct __packed perf_record_cpu_map_data {
>         __u16                    type;
> -       char                     data[];
> +       union {
> +               /* Used when type == PERF_CPU_MAP__CPUS. */
> +               struct cpu_map_entries cpus_data;
> +               /* Used when type == PERF_CPU_MAP__MASK and long_size == 4. */
> +               struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map32 mask32_data;
> +               /* Used when type == PERF_CPU_MAP__MASK and long_size == 8. */
> +               struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map64 mask64_data;
> +       };
>  };

How about moving the 'type' to the union as well?
This way we don't need to pack the entire struct
and can have a common struct for 32 and 64 bit..

struct cpu_map_entries {
    __u16 type;
    __u16 nr;
    __u16 cpu[];
};

struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map {
    __u16 type;
    __u16 nr;
    __u16 long_size;  // still needed?
    __u16 pad;
    unsigned long mask[];
};

// changed it to union
union perf_record_cpu_map_data {
    __u16  type;
    struct cpu_map_entries cpus_data;
    struct perf_record_mask_cpu_map mask_data;
};

Thanks,
Namhyung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ