linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Always expose last resume result

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YqgrFORv5rMggcLs@google.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 06:30:44 +0000
From:   Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/chrome: cros_ec: Always expose last resume
 result

On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:17:50PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Tzung-Bi Shih (2022-06-13 22:30:18)
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:18:25PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > @@ -135,10 +135,10 @@ static int cros_ec_sleep_event(struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev, u8 sleep_event)
> > >       buf.msg.command = EC_CMD_HOST_SLEEP_EVENT;
> > >
> > >       ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec_dev, &buf.msg);
> > > -
> > > -     /* For now, report failure to transition to S0ix with a warning. */
> > > +     /* Report failure to transition to system wide suspend with a warning. */
> > >       if (ret >= 0 && ec_dev->host_sleep_v1 &&
> > > -         (sleep_event == HOST_SLEEP_EVENT_S0IX_RESUME)) {
> > > +         (sleep_event == HOST_SLEEP_EVENT_S0IX_RESUME ||
> > > +          sleep_event == HOST_SLEEP_EVENT_S3_RESUME)) {
> > >               ec_dev->last_resume_result =
> > >                       buf.u.resp1.resume_response.sleep_transitions;
> >
> > The warning in the if-block:
> > WARN_ONCE(buf.u.resp1.resume_response.sleep_transitions &
> >           EC_HOST_RESUME_SLEEP_TIMEOUT,
> >           "EC detected sleep transition timeout. Total slp_s0 transitions: %d",
> >           buf.u.resp1.resume_response.sleep_transitions &
> >           EC_HOST_RESUME_SLEEP_TRANSITIONS_MASK);
> >
> > Not sure and I wonder if the term "slp_s0" is still generic enough to the case.
> > And also [1].
> >
> > [1]: https://crrev.com/a311a7657ca0a488f507fa78fd9c2d825cbf083e/power_manager/powerd/system/suspend_configurator.cc#98
> 
> I don't know what "slp_s0" means. I guess it's some intelism? It could
> change to "sleep" and work for me.
> 
> >
> > At least we should fix [2] once the patch landed.
> >
> > [2]: https://crrev.com/a311a7657ca0a488f507fa78fd9c2d825cbf083e/power_manager/tools/suspend_stress_test#369
> 
> And by fix you mean change "S0iX" to "suspend"?

Yes.