[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220614071757.GA1207@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 09:17:57 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: dsterba@...e.cz,
syzbot <syzbot+d2dd123304b4ae59f1bd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, clm@...com, dsterba@...e.com,
hch@....de, josef@...icpanda.com, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [syzbot] KASAN: use-after-free Read in
copy_page_from_iter_atomic (2)
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 09:39:12PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:10:19AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > syzbot has bisected this issue to:
> >
> > commit 4cd4aed63125ccd4efc35162627827491c2a7be7
> > Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Date: Fri May 27 08:43:20 2022 +0000
> >
> > btrfs: fold repair_io_failure into btrfs_repair_eb_io_failure
>
> Josef also reported a crash and found a bug in the patch, now added as
> fixup that'll be in for-next:
The patch looks correct to me. Two things to note here:
- I hadn't realized you had queued up the series. I've actually
started to merge some of my bio work with the bio split at
submission time work from Qu and after a few iterations I think
I would do the repair code a bit differently based on that.
Can you just drop the series for now?
- I find it interesting that syzbot hits btrfs metadata repair.
xfstests seems to have no coverage and I could not come up with
a good idea how to properly test it. Does anyone have a good
idea on how to intentially corrupt metadata in a deterministic
way?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists