[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220614092312.14006-1-renyu@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:23:12 +0800
From: Ren Yu <renyu@...china.com>
To: cl@...ux.com
Cc: penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, 42.hyeyoo@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liqiong@...china.com,
qixu@...china.com, hukun@...china.com, yuzhe@...china.com,
Ren Yu <renyu@...china.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] mm, slab: check the function kmalloc_slab return value
As the possible failure of the kmalloc_slab,
it should be better to check it.
Signed-off-by: Ren Yu <renyu@...china.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
v2:
- change return value of error path to '-ENOMEM'
- not check for zero
---
mm/slab.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index f8cd00f4ba13..eb3fb042f4f4 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -2064,6 +2064,8 @@ int __kmem_cache_create(struct kmem_cache *cachep, slab_flags_t flags)
if (OFF_SLAB(cachep)) {
cachep->freelist_cache =
kmalloc_slab(cachep->freelist_size, 0u);
+ if (!cachep->freelist_cache)
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
err = setup_cpu_cache(cachep, gfp);
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists