[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqhiWMyuTEeyiLAf@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:26:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] MAINTAINERS: add MEMORY HOT(UN)PLUG section and add
myself as reviewer
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:35:28AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 14.06.22 11:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:12:58PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >> There are certainly a lot more files that partially fall into the memory
> >> hot(un)plug category, including parts of mm/sparse.c, mm/page_isolation.c
> >> and mm/page_alloc.c. Let's only add what's almost completely memory
> >> hot(un)plug related.
> >>
> >> Add myself as reviewer so it's easier for contributors to figure out
> >> whom to CC.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> MAINTAINERS | 12 ++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >> index a6d3bd9d2a8d..77aebce76288 100644
> >> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >> @@ -12848,6 +12848,18 @@ F: include/linux/vmalloc.h
> >> F: mm/
> >> F: tools/testing/selftests/vm/
> >>
> >> +MEMORY HOT(UN)PLUG
> >> +M: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >> +R: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> >> +L: linux-mm@...ck.org
> >> +S: Maintained
> >> +F: Documentation/admin-guide/mm/memory-hotplug.rst
> >> +F: Documentation/core-api/memory-hotplug.rst
> >> +F: drivers/base/memory.c
> >> +F: include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> >> +F: mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >> +F: tools/testing/selftests/memory-hotplug/
> >
> > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> >
> > One question, will patches from you go through my driver core tree, or
> > the -mm tree? Either is fine for me, just curious.
>
> In the past, most stuff regarding drivers/base/memory.c went through
> -mm, so I'd say we keep it like that, unless it's really generic changes
> to the driver model etc.
Sounds great to me, thanks for taking this on, much appreciated!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists