linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Test for "silence" field in struct "pcm_format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 12:43:16 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>
Cc:     Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+205eb15961852c2c5974@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        naveenkumar.sunkari@...bosch.com,
        Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: pcm: Test for "silence" field in struct "pcm_format_data"

On martedì 14 giugno 2022 11:58:51 CEST Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> Hello Fabio, hello All,
> 
> On Sa, Apr 09, 2022 at 03:26:55 +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > Syzbot reports "KASAN: null-ptr-deref Write in
> > snd_pcm_format_set_silence".[1]
> > 
> > It is due to missing validation of the "silence" field of struct
> > "pcm_format_data" in "pcm_formats" array.
> > 
> > Add a test for valid "pat" and, if it is not so, return -EINVAL.
> > 
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
000000000000d188ef05dc2c7279@...gle.com/
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: 
syzbot+205eb15961852c2c5974@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > I wasn't able to figure out the commit for the "Fixes:" tag. If this 
patch
> > is good, can someone please help with providing this missing 
information?
> > 
> >  sound/core/pcm_misc.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> > index 4866aed97aac..5588b6a1ee8b 100644
> > --- a/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> > +++ b/sound/core/pcm_misc.c
> > @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int snd_pcm_format_set_silence(snd_pcm_format_t 
format, void *data, unsigned int
> >  		return 0;
> >  	width = pcm_formats[(INT)format].phys; /* physical width */
> >  	pat = pcm_formats[(INT)format].silence;
> > -	if (! width)
> > +	if (!width || !pat)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	/* signed or 1 byte data */
> >  	if (pcm_formats[(INT)format].signd == 1 || width <= 8) {
> 
> JFYI, PVS-Studio 7.19 reports:
> 
> sound/core/pcm_misc.c	409	warn	V560 A part of 
conditional expression is always false: !pat.

Sorry, I assumed (wrongly!) that when we have

static const struct pcm_format_data 
pcm_formats[(INT)SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_LAST+1] = {
	[SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_S8] = {
		.width = 8, .phys = 8, .le = -1, .signd = 1,
		.silence = {},
	},
	[snip]
	/* FIXME: the following two formats are not defined properly yet 
*/
	[SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_MPEG] = {
		.le = -1, .signd = -1,
	},
	[SNDRV_PCM_FORMAT_GSM] = {
		.le = -1, .signd = -1,
	},

pointer "silence", and then "pat", must be NULL.

I'd better read again how fields of global struct variables are initialized 
:-(

Thanks for this finding,

Fabio

> 
> I haven't fully validated the finding, but it appears to be legit,
> since the pointer variable (as opposed to the contents behind the
> pointer) is always non-null, hence !pat always evaluating to false.
> 
> If the above is true, then the patch likely hasn't introduced any
> regression, but also likely hasn't fixed the original KASAN problem.
> 
> Or are there alternative views?
> 
> BR, Eugeniu.
>