[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220614115345.GA6771@blackbody.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 13:53:45 +0200
From: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 7/8] cgroup/cpuset: Update description of
cpuset.cpus.partition in cgroup-v2.rst
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 08:00:56AM -1000, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Yeah, I don't know why this part is different from any other errors that the
> parent can make.
It's different because a write to parent's cpuset.cpus is independent of
whether cpuset.cpus of its children are exclusive or not.
In an extreme case the children may be non-exclusive
parent cpuset.cpus=0-3 // valid partition
`- child_1 cpuset.cpus=0-1 // invalid partition
`- child_2 cpuset.cpus=1-2 // invalid partition
but the parent can still be a valid partition (thanks to cpu no. 3 in
the example above).
Do I miss anything?
Thanks,
Michal
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists