[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqocEWUWkr09RLuk@xz-m1.local>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:51:13 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
James Houghton <jthoughton@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] hugetlb: skip to end of PT page mapping when pte
not present
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 10:27:25AM -0700, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> In many cases, the hugetlb specific page table routines are the same as
> the generic routines. But, there are a few exceptions. IMO, it would
> be better to first try to cleanup and unify those routines. That would
> make changes to the walker routines less invasive and easier to
> maintain. I believe is other code that would benefit from such a
> cleanup. Unless there are strong objections, I suggest we move forward
> with the optimization here and move the cleanup and possible walker
> changes to a later series.
No objection on my side, thanks Mike for trying to look into it.
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists