linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Rollback post_handler on failed arm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:09:16 +0800
From:   chuang <nashuiliang@...il.com>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes: Rollback post_handler on failed arm_kprobe()

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:34 AM Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Chuang,
>
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 17:06:33 +0800
> Chuang W <nashuiliang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > In a scenario where livepatch and aggrprobe coexist, if arm_kprobe()
> > returns an error, ap.post_handler, while has been modified to
> > p.post_handler, is not rolled back.
>
> Would you mean 'coexist' on the same function?

Yes, It's the same function.

>
> >
> > When ap.post_handler is not NULL (not rolled back), the caller (e.g.
> > register_kprobe/enable_kprobe) of arm_kprobe_ftrace() will always fail.
>
> It seems this explanation and the actual code does not
> match. Can you tell me what actually you observed?
>
> Thank you,
>

I briefly describe the steps involved, a patch (kprobes: Rollback
kprobe flags on failed arm_kprobe,
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220612213156.1323776351ee1be3cabc7fcc@kernel.org/T/)
must be added, otherwise it will panic:

1) add a livepatch

$ insmod livepatch-XXX.ko

2) add a kprobe using tracefs API

$ echo 'p:mykprobe XXX' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/kprobe_events

At this time, XXX is a simple kprobe, kprobe->post_handler = NULL.

3) add a second kprobe using raw kprobe API (i.e. register_kprobe),
the new kprobe->post_handler != NULL

$ insmod kprobe_XXX.ko
$ insmod: ERROR: could not insert module kprobe_XXX.ko: Device or resource busy

This will fail (as expected). However, XXX is modified to an
aggrprobe. agKprobe->post_handler = aggr_post_handler, it's not rolled
back on failed arm_kprobe().

4) add a third kprobe using bpftrace/bcc tool

$ bpftrace -e 'kprobe:XXX {printf("%s", kstack());}'
Attaching 1 probe...
perf_event_open(/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/p_XXX_0_1_bcc_440/id):
Device or resource busy
Error attaching probe: 'kprobe:blkcg_destroy_blkgs'
$ bpftrace -e 'kprobe:XXX {printf("%s", kstack());}'
Attaching 1 probe...
perf_event_open(/sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/kprobes/p_XXX_0_1_bcc_440/id):
Device or resource busy
Error attaching probe: 'kprobe:blkcg_destroy_blkgs'

This will always fail (not as expected).

> >
> > Fixes: 12310e343755 ("kprobes: Propagate error from arm_kprobe_ftrace()")
> > Signed-off-by: Chuang W <nashuiliang@...il.com>
> > Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  kernel/kprobes.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > index f214f8c088ed..0610b02a3a05 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c
> > @@ -1300,6 +1300,7 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> >  {
> >       int ret = 0;
> >       struct kprobe *ap = orig_p;
> > +     kprobe_post_handler_t old_post_handler = NULL;
> >
> >       cpus_read_lock();
> >
> > @@ -1351,6 +1352,9 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> >
> >       /* Copy the insn slot of 'p' to 'ap'. */
> >       copy_kprobe(ap, p);
> > +
> > +     /* save the old post_handler */
> > +     old_post_handler = ap->post_handler;
> >       ret = add_new_kprobe(ap, p);
> >
> >  out:
> > @@ -1365,6 +1369,7 @@ static int register_aggr_kprobe(struct kprobe *orig_p, struct kprobe *p)
> >                       ret = arm_kprobe(ap);
> >                       if (ret) {
> >                               ap->flags |= KPROBE_FLAG_DISABLED;
> > +                             ap->post_handler = old_post_handler;
> >                               list_del_rcu(&p->list);
> >                               synchronize_rcu();
> >                       }
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
>
>
> --
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>