linux-kernel - Re: Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:34:10 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 01:28:00PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:55:53PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > Per the above RCU commit and commit 6c5218715286 ("context_tracking:
> > Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU"), it appears that the following diff
> > is the proper fix up. Would you mind applying it to the merge of
> > whichever tree comes second if possible? I did build and boot test it
> > but it would not be a bad idea for Sami and Frederic to verify that it
> > is correct so that Kees/Paul can mention it to Linus :)
> 
> Actually, the CFI fix (and a few others) are meant to be sent for
> -rc3, so if the ct_irq_enter() change is in -next, this can maybe get
> sorted out?

Indeed, Frederic's context-tracking series is for the next merge window.
So once your changes are added, I will adjust.

							Thanx, Paul