linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix the timing of configuring device regulators

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f51578a139b028f2fa85e738d52f50356027bb26.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:49:14 +0800
From:   Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        <avri.altman@....com>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
CC:     <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, <chun-hung.wu@...iatek.com>,
        <alice.chao@...iatek.com>, <powen.kao@...iatek.com>,
        <mason.zhang@...iatek.com>, <qilin.tan@...iatek.com>,
        <lin.gui@...iatek.com>, <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
        <tun-yu.yu@...iatek.com>, <cc.chou@...iatek.com>,
        <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>, <jiajie.hao@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] scsi: ufs-mediatek: Fix the timing of
 configuring device regulators

On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 09:33 -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 6/14/22 07:16, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > +int ufs_mtk_system_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +	ret = ufshcd_system_suspend(dev);
> > +
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		ufs_mtk_vreg_set_lpm(hba, true);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> 
> Please use the traditional kernel coding style and return early in
> case 
> of an error. For the above code, that means to rewrite it as follows:
> 
> 	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	ret = ufshcd_system_suspend(dev);
> 	if (ret)
> 		return ret;
> 
> 	ufs_mtk_vreg_set_lpm(hba, true);
> 
> 	return 0;

OK! Fixed in v4.

> 
> > +int ufs_mtk_system_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +	ufs_mtk_vreg_set_lpm(hba, false);
> > +
> > +	ret = ufshcd_system_resume(dev);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Please remove the variable 'ret' from the above function.

OK! Fixed in v4.
> 
> > +int ufs_mtk_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	ret = ufshcd_runtime_suspend(dev);
> > +
> > +	if (!ret)
> > +		ufs_mtk_vreg_set_lpm(hba, true);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Please use the "early return" style.

OK! Fixed in v4.
> 
> > +int ufs_mtk_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct ufs_hba *hba = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	ufs_mtk_vreg_set_lpm(hba, false);
> > +
> > +	ret = ufshcd_runtime_resume(dev);
> > +
> > +	return ret;
> > +}
> 
> Please remove the variable 'ret' from the above function.

OK! Fixed in v4.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.