lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqmrIsOEsFoKTwEK@lahna>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:49:22 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Oleksandr Ocheretnyi -X (oocheret - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco)" 
        <oocheret@...co.com>
Cc:     "tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com" <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
        "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        "p.yadav@...com" <p.yadav@...com>,
        "michael@...le.cc" <michael@...le.cc>,
        "richard@....at" <richard@....at>,
        "vigneshr@...com" <vigneshr@...com>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mauro.lima@...ypsium.com" <mauro.lima@...ypsium.com>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: handle unsupported FSR opcodes properly

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 05:56:54PM +0000, Oleksandr Ocheretnyi -X (oocheret - GLOBALLOGIC INC at Cisco) wrote:
>    Hello Mika,
> 
>    in my case (I work with memory chip n25q128a13 for recent kernels) I'm
>    getting return value -ENOTSUPP from spi_mem_exec_op() call in the
>    micron_st_nor_read_fsr() method
>    [[1]https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19-rc2/source/drivers/spi/spi-m
>    em.c#L326]. So I decided to provide the same errorcode to
>    intel_spi_hw_cycle() method because older kernel versions throw the
>    error there. It is fine to use -EOPNOTSUPP return value instead.
> 
>    I suspect we need to cover both cases to check -ENOTSUPP as well as
>    -EOPNOTSUPP to let the driver work properly.
> 
>    if (ret == -ENOTSUPP || ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)

I think we should follow the same in the Intel driver and return
-ENOTSUPP too.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ