[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2dbaed8b-1a19-6bed-5b5b-bebff4b0648e@zonque.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 11:49:40 +0200
From: Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>
To: heliang <windhl@....com>, haojian.zhuang@...il.com,
robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, linux@...linux.org.uk
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm: mach-pxa: Add missing of_node_put in irq.c
Hi,
On 6/15/22 11:12, heliang wrote:
> In pxa_dt_irq_init(), of_find_matching_node() will return a node
> pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put in
> fail path or when it is not used anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: heliang <windhl@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> index 96f33ef1d9ea..a81e9ffb77af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/irq.c
> @@ -246,12 +246,14 @@ void __init pxa_dt_irq_init(int (*fn)(struct irq_data *, unsigned int))
> ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "marvell,intc-nr-irqs",
> &pxa_internal_irq_nr);
> if (ret) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> pr_err("Not found marvell,intc-nr-irqs property\n");
> return;
How about jumping to a label here instead of a plain "return"?
> }
>
> ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> if (ret < 0) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> pr_err("No registers defined for node\n");
> return;
Same here.
> }
> @@ -262,10 +264,12 @@ void __init pxa_dt_irq_init(int (*fn)(struct irq_data *, unsigned int))
>
> ret = irq_alloc_descs(-1, 0, pxa_internal_irq_nr, 0);
> if (ret < 0) {
> + of_node_put(node);
> pr_err("Failed to allocate IRQ numbers\n");
> return;
And here.
> }
>
> pxa_init_irq_common(node, pxa_internal_irq_nr, fn);
Jump target would go here.
> + of_node_put(node);
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_OF */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists