[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220615110022.yifrsvzxjsz2wky5@quack3.lan>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:00:22 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Backlund <tmb@....nu>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Slade Watkins <slade@...dewatkins.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/251] 5.15.47-rc2 review
On Tue 14-06-22 12:00:22, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 11:51 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Or just make sure that noop_backing_dev_info is fully initialized
> > before it's used.
>
> I don't see any real reason why that
>
> err = bdi_init(&noop_backing_dev_info);
>
> couldn't just be done very early. Maybe as the first call in
> driver_init(), before the whole devtmpfs_init() etc.
I've checked the dependencies and cgroups (which are the only non-trivial
dependency besides per-CPU infrastructure) are initialized early enough so
it should work fine. So let's try that.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists