linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 14/19] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs if needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220615131316.6336eb6d@p-imbrenda>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:13:16 +0200
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scgl@...ux.ibm.com,
        mimu@...ux.ibm.com, nrb@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/19] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs
 if needed

On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:57:39 +0200
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

[...]

> >> I think we should switch this patch and the next one and add this struct
> >> to the next patch. The list work below makes more sense once the next
> >> patch has been read.  
> > 
> > but the next patch will leave leftovers in some circumstances, and
> > those won't be cleaned up without this patch.
> > 
> > having this patch first means that when the next patch is applied, the
> > leftovers are already taken care of  
> 
> Then I opt for squashing the patch.
> 
> Without the next patch prepared_for_async_deinit will always be NULL and 
> this code is completely unneeded, no?

correct. I had split them to make them smaller and easier to review

I will squash them if you think it's better

> 
> >   
> >>>    static void kvm_s390_clear_pv_state(struct kvm *kvm)
> >>>    {
> >>>    	kvm->arch.pv.handle = 0;
> >>> @@ -158,23 +171,88 @@ static int kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
> >>>    	return -ENOMEM;
> >>>    }
> >>>        
> >>  
> >>>        
> >>  
> >   
>