linux-kernel - Re: 2 second nvme initialization delay regression in 5.18 [Was: Re: [bug report]nvme0: Admin Cmd(0x6), I/O Error (sct 0x0 / sc 0x2) MORE DNR observed during blktests]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:31:06 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@...il.com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        "R, Monish Kumar" <monish.kumar.r@...el.com>,
        "open list:NVM EXPRESS DRIVER" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        "alan.adamson@...cle.com" <alan.adamson@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...hat.com>,
        Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, "axboe@...com" <axboe@...com>,
        "Rao, Abhijeet" <abhijeet.rao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: 2 second nvme initialization delay regression in 5.18 [Was:
 Re: [bug report]nvme0: Admin Cmd(0x6), I/O Error (sct 0x0 / sc 0x2)
 MORE DNR observed during blktests]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 12:27:57PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > It all appears as PCIe, but the pci_dev has an is_thunderbolt flag.
> > 
> > Thanks to both of you for the information.  I'd like to wait until the
> > end of the week or so if we can hear something from Samsung, and if we
> > don't we'll have to quirk based on the model number.
> Our FW team has started looking into the issue. They said they will try
> to come up with a solution before 5.20. If not, we can add this quirk
> based on the FW ver. and a proper solution can be added by 5.21.

I don't think we can wait for 5.20 - the "offending" commit is in
5.19-rc and -stable.  So I'll plan to prepare a patch based on the model
number for now, still hoping we can come up with something better
eventually.