linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Use div64_ul instead of do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6ad85a23-0156-2774-1215-ea02257cc107@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:48:21 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Use div64_ul instead of do_div

On 26/04/2022 16:21, Wan Jiabing wrote:
> Fix following coccicheck warning:
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c:72:1-7: WARNING: do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_ul instead.
> 
> Use div64_ul instead of do_div to avoid a possible truncation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wan Jiabing <wanjiabing@...o.com>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> index d2539ca78c29..c2ea978c8921 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu_devfreq.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static void get_raw_dev_status(struct msm_gpu *gpu,
>   	df->time = time;
>   
>   	busy_time *= USEC_PER_SEC;
> -	do_div(busy_time, sample_rate);
> +	busy_time = div64_ul(busy_time, sample_rate);
>   	if (WARN_ON(busy_time > ~0LU))
>   		busy_time = ~0LU;
>   


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry