linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: phy: add remote fault support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jun 2022 18:52:21 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] net: phy: add remote fault support

On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 16:56:37 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> That would suggest we
> want a ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_REMOTE_FAULT_BIT, which we can set in
> supported and maybe see in lpa?

Does this dovetail well with ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_EXT_STATE /
ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_EXT_SUBSTATE ?

That's where people who read extended link state out of FW put it
(and therefore it's read only now).

In case I'm just confused and this is different we should prolly
add a paragraph in docs to disambiguate.