linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 15:27:54 +0200
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Replace kmap() with kmap_local_page() in zstd.c

On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:07:34AM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 06:28:48PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > On martedì 14 giugno 2022 16:25:21 CEST David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:22:50AM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> > > > On lunedì 13 giugno 2022 20:39:13 CEST David Sterba wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 03:52:03PM +0200, Fabio M. De Francesco 
> 
> > > > A better solution is changing the prototype of __kunmap_local(); I
> > > > suppose that Andrew won't object, but who knows?
> > > > 
> > > > (+Cc Andrew Morton).
> > > > 
> > > > I was waiting for your comments. At now I've done about 15 conversions 
> > > > across the kernel but it's the first time I had to pass a pointer to 
> > const 
> > > > void to kunmap_local(). Therefore, I was not sure if changing the API 
> > were 
> > > > better suited (however I have already discussed this with Ira).
> > > 
> > > IMHO it should be fixed in the API.
> > > 
> > I agree with you in full.
> > 
> > At the same time when you sent this email I submitted a patch to change 
> > kunmap_local() and kunmap_atomic().
> > 
> > After Andrew takes them I'll send v2 of this patch to zstd.c without those 
> > unnecessary casts.
> 
> David,
> 
> Would you be willing to take this through your tree as a pre-patch to the kmap
> changes in btrfs?
> 
> That would be easier for Fabio and probably you and Andrew in the long run.

Yes, no problem. I could probably send all the kmap conversions after
tests so it does not need to wait until the next cycle.