linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220615141732.1265627-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:17:32 +0200
From:   Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
        Brian Cain <bcain@...cinc.com>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
        Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
        sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants

From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2022 17:22:30 +0200

> Hi Olek,

Hi!

> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 4:28 PM Alexander Lobakin
> <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 1:35 PM Alexander Lobakin
> > > <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
> > > On m68k, using gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04), this
> > > blows up immediately with:
> >
> > Yeah I saw the kernel bot report already, sorry for that >_< Fixed
> > in v3 already, will send in 1-2 days.
> 
> Is it simple to fix?
> I might be able to give the fixed v2 a try before that.
> Thanks!

Oh, sorry for the late reply, was busy with stuff.
It's linear, there are (after applying the series) some static
inlines in arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops.h (those which were
converted from macros in patch 3/6), 7 ops in total, you just need
to create definitions with 'arch_' prefix for each of them, e.g.

#define arch_test_bit	test_bit
#define arch___set_bit	__set_bit // will be ___set_bit after 5/6

etc.
Hope I explained it clear-ish :)

> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

Thanks,
Olek