lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 11:45:17 -0500
From:   Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Default async probing for DT based systems

Hi Saravana,

You failed to include me in the distribution.  Adding myself now...

-Frank

On 6/15/22 23:24, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> TL;DR: I want to improve boot times by enabling async probing by
> default for DT based systems. Can you give it a shot please?
> 
> Why do you think it might work when async probing has been a pain before?
> ==========================================================
> Since fw_devlink=on is the default behavior and fw_devlink understands
> approximately 24 DT bindings, it should capture most of the device
> dependencies and ensure proper probe ordering. For example, on a Pixel
> 6, fw_devlink figures out 325 dependencies that it uses to enforce
> probe ordering.
> 
> You can find all the dependencies under /sys/class/devlink.
> 
> Fine! What do you want me to try?
> ==========================
> With the patches that have landed in 5.19-rc1, we can now enable
> default async probing for all built-in drivers by adding the following
> to the kernel command line:
> 
> driver_async_probe=*
> 
> I'd really appreciate it if folks can try adding driver_async_probe=*
> to their kernel command line and report any boot time
> improvements/regression or boot/probe failures it causes.
> 
> (* insert cat begging pic *)
> Can I haz some reports pleez?!
> 
> Tips:
> ====
> One easy way to check for devices probe failures is to compare the
> output of this command with/without the commandline changes:
> 
> # find /sys/devices -name driver
> 
> Btw, if you need to force sync probing for a few drivers so that your
> rootfs mounts properly, you can set the flag in the driver, or you can
> list them as exceptions following the * in the command line option.
> For example:
> driver_async_probe=*,my_flash_driver,my_sdio_driver
> 
> Report these too.
> 
> Known issues:
> ===========
> fw_devlink doesn't yet support phy-handle and mdio-parent DT bindings.
> They have some tricky issues I need to resolve first and I need to add
> both of them together -- I'm working on it. If there are other DT
> bindings that are missing support, do let me know. Most of them are
> easy to add.
> 
> The driver_async_probe=* won't have any useful impact for modules
> without adding <module_name>.async_probe to the commandline or
> async_probe as a module option when loading it. This is because
> modules intentionally force sync before they exit. There's a patch for
> a global flag for modules too [1], but it can never be set by default
> for userspace reasons[2].
> 
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220604010101.719508-1-saravanak@google.com/
> [2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFxV40V2WvNtJY3EC0F-B9wPk8CV2o1TTTyoF4CoWH7rhQ@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Thanks,
> Saravana
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ