[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqtgWesFK9Hkm9h9@google.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:54:49 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] KVM: Avoid pfn_to_page() and vice versa when
releasing pages
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 4/29/22 03:04, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > -
> > +/*
> > + * Note, checking for an error/noslot pfn is the caller's responsibility when
> > + * directly marking a page dirty/accessed. Unlike the "release" helpers, the
> > + * "set" helpers are not to be unused when the pfn might point at garbage.
> > + */
>
> s/unused/unused/
LOL, s/unused/used? :-)
> But while at it, I'd rather add a WARN_ON(is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn)).
I've no objection to that. IIRC, I almost added it myself, but my mental coin
flip came up wrong.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists