linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 02/15] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220616191945.23935-3-logang@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 13:19:32 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/15] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function

There are a few uses of an ugly ternary operator in raid5_make_request()
to check if a sector is a head of a reshape sector.

Factor this out into a simple helper called ahead_of_reshape().

No functional changes intended.

Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index b3d1f894f154..6e53b8490fff 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5784,6 +5784,13 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
 	bio_endio(bi);
 }
 
+static bool ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector,
+			     sector_t reshape_sector)
+{
+	return mddev->reshape_backwards ? sector < reshape_sector :
+					  sector >= reshape_sector;
+}
+
 static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 {
 	struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
@@ -5840,9 +5847,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 	/* Bail out if conflicts with reshape and REQ_NOWAIT is set */
 	if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
 	    (conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
-	    (mddev->reshape_backwards
-	    ? (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress && logical_sector < conf->reshape_safe)
-	    : (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe && logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress))) {
+	    !ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector, conf->reshape_progress) &&
+	    ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector, conf->reshape_safe)) {
 		bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
 		if (rw == WRITE)
 			md_write_end(mddev);
@@ -5871,14 +5877,12 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 			 * to check again.
 			 */
 			spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
-			if (mddev->reshape_backwards
-			    ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress
-			    : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress) {
+			if (ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+					     conf->reshape_progress)) {
 				previous = 1;
 			} else {
-				if (mddev->reshape_backwards
-				    ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_safe
-				    : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe) {
+				if (ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+						     conf->reshape_safe)) {
 					spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
 					schedule();
 					do_prepare = true;
@@ -5909,9 +5913,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
 				 */
 				int must_retry = 0;
 				spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
-				if (mddev->reshape_backwards
-				    ? logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress
-				    : logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress)
+				if (!ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+						      conf->reshape_progress))
 					/* mismatch, need to try again */
 					must_retry = 1;
 				spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
-- 
2.30.2