lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_OBCaYgrQDpX7x9VH9SQ2XcH8LhY4VTSiB7qX8J9nt+ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:34:47 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 15 (drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c)

Pushed to drm-misc-next.

Alex

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 7:26 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 13:52:34 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 04:45:16PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 4:24 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 03:28:52PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 3:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 6/14/22 23:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Changes since 20220614:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > on i386:
> > > > > > # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function ‘amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register’:
> > > > > > ../drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:6599:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘crtc_debugfs_init’; did you mean ‘amdgpu_debugfs_init’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > > >   crtc_debugfs_init(crtc);
> > > > > >   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > >   amdgpu_debugfs_init
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Full randconfig file is attached.
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried building with your config and I can't repro this.  As Harry
> > > > > noted, that function and the whole secure display feature depend on
> > > > > debugfs.  It should never be built without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.  See
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/Kconfig:
> > > > >
> > > > > > config DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY
> > > > > >         bool "Enable secure display support"
> > > > > >         default n
> > > > > >         depends on DEBUG_FS
> > > > > >         depends on DRM_AMD_DC_DCN
> > > > > >         help
> > > > > >             Choose this option if you want to
> > > > > >             support secure display
> > > > > >
> > > > > >             This option enables the calculation
> > > > > >             of crc of specific region via debugfs.
> > > > > >             Cooperate with specific DMCU FW.
> > > > >
> > > > > amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register is guarded by
> > > > > CONIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY.  It's not clear to me how we could hit
> > > > > this.
> > > >
> > > > I think the problem is that you are not looking at the right tree.
> > > >
> > > > The kernel test robot reported [1] [2] this error is caused by commit
> > > > 4cd79f614b50 ("drm/amd/display: Move connector debugfs to drm"), which
> > > > is in the drm-misc tree on the drm-misc-next branch. That change removes
> > > > the #ifdef around amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register(), meaning that
> > > > crtc_debugfs_init() can be called without CONFIG_DRM_AMD_SECURE_DISPLAY
> > > > and CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.
> > > >
> > > >   $ git show -s --format='%h ("%s")'
> > > >   abf0ba5a34ea ("drm/bridge: it6505: Add missing CRYPTO_HASH dependency")
> > > >
> > > >   $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 mrproper defconfig
> > > >
> > > >   $ scripts/config -d BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE -d DEBUG_FS -e DRM_AMDGPU
> > > >
> > > >   $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.o
> > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: In function ‘amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register’:
> > > >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:6622:9: error: implicit declaration of function ‘crtc_debugfs_init’; did you mean ‘amdgpu_debugfs_init’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > >    6622 |         crtc_debugfs_init(crtc);
> > > >         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >         |         amdgpu_debugfs_init
> > > >   cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> > > >
> > > > Contrast that with the current top of your tree:
> > > >
> > > >   $ git show -s --format='%h ("%s")'
> > > >   c435f61d0eb3 ("drm/amd/display: Drop unnecessary guard from DC resource")
> > > >
> > > >   $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 mrproper defconfig
> > > >
> > > >   $ scripts/config -d BLK_DEV_IO_TRACE -d DEBUG_FS -e DRM_AMDGPU
> > > >
> > > >   $ make -skj"$(nproc)" ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.o
> > > >
> > > >   $ echo $?
> > > >   0
> > > >
> > > > Randy's patch [3] seems like it should resolve the issue just fine but
> > > > it needs to be applied to drm-misc-next, not the amdgpu tree.
> > >
> > > Thanks for tracking this down.  I think something like the attached
> > > patch is cleaner since the whole thing is only valid for debugfs.
> >
> > Makes sense! I tested the below patch with and without DEBUG_FS and saw
> > no errors.
> >
> > > From b0bcacd86344998e0ca757f89c6c4cd3b6298999 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> > > Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 16:40:39 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/display: fix build when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
> > >
> > > amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register is only used when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > > so make it dependent on that.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4cd79f614b50 ("drm/amd/display: Move connector debugfs to drm")
> > > Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > > Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> >
> > Tested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> # build
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> > > index c9004f7e700d..33cd7a3d4ecb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> > > @@ -6594,12 +6594,14 @@ dm_crtc_duplicate_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > >     return &state->base;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> > >  static int amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > >  {
> > >     crtc_debugfs_init(crtc);
> > >
> > >     return 0;
> > >  }
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > >  static inline int dm_set_vupdate_irq(struct drm_crtc *crtc, bool enable)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -6693,7 +6695,9 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs amdgpu_dm_crtc_funcs = {
> > >     .enable_vblank = dm_enable_vblank,
> > >     .disable_vblank = dm_disable_vblank,
> > >     .get_vblank_timestamp = drm_crtc_vblank_helper_get_vblank_timestamp,
> > > +#if defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_FS)
> > >     .late_register = amdgpu_dm_crtc_late_register,
> > > +#endif
> > >  };
> > >
> > >  static enum drm_connector_status
>
> OK, I will apply that patch to the merge of the drm-misc tree from
> today (until someone actaully applies it to some tree).
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ